![]() ![]() |
| Guest_T. A. G. Ger_* |
Oct 3 2008, 15:15
Post
#1
|
|
Guests |
I'll start with examples.
Below is three listings from "metaflac.exe --list --block-number=2" command from one FLAC file (I removed some original tags with metaflac.exe "--remove-tag=" command for this to be easier to read): 1) ORIGINAL: CODE METADATA block #2 type: 4 (VORBIS_COMMENT) is last: false length: 157 vendor string: reference libFLAC 1.2.1 20070917 comments: 6 comment[0]: artist=Corduroy comment[1]: album=Out Of Here comment[2]: Tracknumber=01/13 comment[3]: discname= comment[4]: title=Don't Wait For Monday comment[5]: comment= 2) Edited + saved from the tag panel (using ORIGINAL as base): CODE METADATA block #2 type: 4 (VORBIS_COMMENT) is last: false length: 153 vendor string: reference libFLAC 1.2.1 20070917 comments: 5 comment[0]: discname= comment[1]: Album=Out Of Here comment[2]: Artist=Corduroy CHANGED comment[3]: Title=Don't Wait For Monday comment[4]: Tracknumber=01/13 3) Edited + saved from the extended tags dialog (using ORIGINAL as base): CODE METADATA block #2 type: 4 (VORBIS_COMMENT) is last: false length: 144 vendor string: reference libFLAC 1.2.1 20070917 comments: 4 comment[0]: album=Out Of Here comment[1]: ARTIST=Corduroy CHANGED 222 comment[2]: title=Don't Wait For Monday comment[3]: Tracknumber=01/13 Problems:
My suggestions how these problems should be fixed:
The thread where this started from: Empty "Comment" tag (flac) removed when saving. Tested with versions 2.41 & 2.41c beta. |
|
|
|
| Guest_T. A. G. Ger_* |
Oct 20 2008, 00:12
Post
#2
|
|
Guests |
Hmm, is there a problem deciphering my bug report? Do I need to add more information?
Thanks. (Patiently trying to wait for this to be fixed.. or at least recognized. |
|
|
|
Oct 21 2008, 09:56
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Developer Group: Admin Posts: 7621 Joined: 12-December 01 From: Germany, Dresden Member No.: 203 Mp3tag Version: 2.55a |
The post is recognized (I was following the other one too) but I'm simply too busy with preparing the new version at the moment to look into it.
But I will for sure, when v2.42 is out. -------------------- |
|
|
|
Oct 31 2008, 04:12
Post
#4
|
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 12-April 08 Member No.: 6840 Mp3tag Version: 2.40 |
When tagging "PUBLISHER" for FLAC files, mp3tag somehow turn it into the "Organization" field instead.
For example, when I tag 'EMI' as Publisher into a FLAC file, it would not show up in Winamp's File Info -> Basic Info -> Publisher field; when I click on the Advanced tab, it'd list 'EMI' as under the "Organization" field, which is useless as no one would read that. This post has been edited by Anonym: Oct 31 2008, 04:15 |
|
|
|
| Guest_T. A. G. Ger_* |
Dec 10 2008, 00:38
Post
#5
|
|
Guests |
Hi Florian, I don't want to sound ungrateful and hasty but, the infamous but, could you please update the situation with these problems? (mark confirmed/etc.) And possibly tell what of these you're not going to change.
You see, I've waited several months now with about 300 CD's laying around waiting for these things to be fixed. I've an external script ready for a procedure where I add some tags and.. anyways, I wanted to use Mp3tag GUI (+launch tool) for selecting files.. I tried to save time by not having to code a temp GUI for this.. but now I'm getting inpatient, unfortunately.. Thanks.. and sorry. |
|
|
|
Dec 10 2008, 10:00
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Developer Group: Admin Posts: 7621 Joined: 12-December 01 From: Germany, Dresden Member No.: 203 Mp3tag Version: 2.55a |
No, I'm sorry for not coming back to this topic. The last few weeks have been very busy and what you can see on the forums is only a part of the total support load.
I promise to give an update on this by the weekend. -------------------- |
|
|
|
Dec 12 2008, 21:50
Post
#7
|
|
![]() Developer Group: Admin Posts: 7621 Joined: 12-December 01 From: Germany, Dresden Member No.: 203 Mp3tag Version: 2.55a |
My suggestions how these problems should be fixed:
Kind regards, Florian -------------------- |
|
|
|
| Guest_T. A. G. Ger_* |
Dec 12 2008, 22:25
Post
#8
|
|
Guests |
Finally, thank you.
But, your response was a HUGE disappointment. 1-2. Lame excuse, not possible? You're the coder, you've the power to change it. Right? DetlevD is backing me on this that these are BUGS. 3. Ok. 4. In short: lame. So I should populate all my empty tag values (which are set that way when the FLAC file is encoded) if I ever want to use your software?! Sheesh, that's lame. I'm really disappointed after waiting several months.. and because now I've to find me a new tagging software.. and not just because you won't implement the feature in the 4th list item.. it's the 1-2 list items, I thought that those would be a clear case. Oh well, I think that I should say thanks anyways, so, thanks, and bye (I'll follow this thread for some time). |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th May 2013 - 18:15 |